Blog | FunStylers

Mazda has released the first images 2011 and Mazda6 facelift details and announced that the new version will premiere at the Geneva Motor Show in March. Regarding the exterior design goes, the Mazda6 facelift in 2011 equipped with headlamps and new rear light clusters. The 2011 Mazda6 facelift also comes with new chassis settings, adaptive front lighting and hill launch assist.

The engine line-up of the 2011 Mazda6 facelift has six engines, including a new and more efficient 2.0-liter DISI gasoline unit. This new engine is mated to a five speed automatic transmission. The Mazda6 facelift in 2011 also offers updated versions of the MZR 1.8 and the 2.5 liter engines while the MZR-CD 2.2-liter turbo diesel unit is offered in three power levels, from 129 to 180 PS.
Link

Ingolstadt announced 2010 Audi R8 price V10 on the U.S. market. 2010 Audi R8 V10 will be available in North America in two versions: with a manual transmission and automatic transmission R tronic. 2010 Audi R8 V10 is powered by a 10-cylinder 5.2-liter FSI engine that sends 525 hp and 391 Nm of torque to all four wheels by means of quattro all-wheel-drive. This means that 2010 Audi R8 V10 is able to get from 0 to 60 mph in 3.7 seconds.

If you do not fancy exhaust note 2010 Audi R8 V10, which we think the car is also equipped with a 465-watt Bang & Olufsen Sound System to listen to while driving in a 10-way heated sport seats.

2010 Audi R8 price V10 for the U.S. begins with 146.000 USD for the manual and automatic 155.100 USD. If the 2010 Audi R8 V10 price is too high, you can have a V8 version of the Audi R8 from 114.200 USD.
(Via zercustoms)

As a foster mom, I clothed, fed and cared for a child in need. But it’s the birth mother who gets the tax break
BY LAURA DEURMYER
The going rate for a kid in the United States is $4,600 and change to families making $110,000 or less in 2009 . At least that’s what my tax prep computer program is telling me. (A $3,650 dependent deduction plus a $1,000 child tax credit.) So the mightier your uterus, the bigger your tax break. My uterus is weak and puny and has produced only one child. But my husband and I foster-parent in our hometown of Lubbock, Texas, and one of the ways the government compensates foster parents is by allowing us to claim tax deductions and credits for our charges as though they had popped out of our own baby-makers. Or so we thought.

So, I set about doing our taxes to include the little boy who spent a little more than half the year with us in 2009. No big deal, right? Wrong.

According to our case worker, the only time you get to claim a foster child as a dependent is when the state has forcibly wrenched the child away from his or her natural family. Voluntary placement kids are still deductible by their natural parent(s). (Those who want to read the specifics of the law can at IRS.gov.)

Many kids are in foster care because their parents voluntarily gave them up — either because they could not afford to feed and house them or because they are in prison, or because they just don’t want to be bothered. One of our friends fosters two little boys who were voluntarily placed at birth. They are both 6 years old now. For six years, our friend has fed, clothed, loved, band-aided, taught and honored these children, apparently all without being able to deduct them as dependents. To a single mom on a high school teacher’s salary, that’s a huge disadvantage, financially.

A couple of years ago, when our finances weren’t as tight and we had not even dreamed of a child, I would have thought, “how crass — griping about a tax deduction instead of thinking about helping a child.” I still feel somewhat like that — we won’t stop fostering if we can’t claim tax deductions; in fact, if the government revoked all tax deductions and charged people for kids instead, we’d still have had our own son, and been just as grateful for it. I just have to wonder what we are trying to achieve as a society with the policies we have set around children and taxes.

On the one hand, we have a problem with more demand for social services than we have the will or the heart to budget for. The more impoverished kids, the more demand. Worldwide population growth is an environmental concern on many levels, from food scarcity to global warming. But instead of teaching family planning in our schools and encouraging young people to have fewer rather than more children, we offer the single biggest tax incentive available to average people (outside of the mortgage interest deduction) to those who procreate the most. And we discourage families from taking care of kids whose own parents can’t care for them by denying that tax deduction to at least some of those caretaker families.

The little boy we had in our home was moved to another foster family because he was behaving threateningly toward our son. He’s a great little boy and is now in a home with his natural sister, where his behavior is exemplary. He and our son still play together. We would have cared for him even had we known from the start that we would not be able to claim him as a dependent.

His mom has five children. She was broke and homeless and living in her Escalade when she placed the kids in care. Now she’s broke and living with some guy with whom she reportedly smokes dope and goes to bars when she’s not in hairdresser classes.

She sold the Escalade and bought a little BMW 5 series with the proceeds. My heart broke thinking of the eldest child seeing her mom’s new car. She’s a precocious 7 years old and can count well enough to see that three car seats, two booster seats and Mom will not fit in that car. Since the mom can claim all five children despite their being in other homes more than two-thirds of the year, she should get a handsome sum back from the government after she does her taxes. Hopefully, she will use the money to get a more suitable car and put a deposit on an apartment. That’s our case worker’s hope anyway. I’m not holding my breath.

Foster parenting is wonderful and terrible. Amazing children, amazing love. Monotonous paperwork that goes on forever, home inspections, CPR classes, licenses, continuing education. Getting attached and having to step aside for a natural family member. Getting attached and having to admit that there are some behavior issues that you just can’t handle.

Voluntary placements get turned away by our agency regularly because there is no home to place the child in. I wonder how many families won’t take voluntary placement children because of the tax rule giving the deductions/credits for voluntarily placed children to their natural parent if they choose to claim them. Personally, I think that we foster parents who’ve actually cared for a child during the greater part of the year have earned the $4,600.
Link

Read the rest of this entry »

If your business operates with a small number of core staff, it’s likely that every role is vital, so when a person leaves, or a position is created, there’s typically little room for manoeuvre. Therefore you need to be sure you have found the right person, as making the wrong decision could prove costly.

Attract the right applicants
Many businesses stumble at the first hurdle when recruiting by failing to properly assess the position. Think about what the role currently involves and what it may involve in the future, and make a list of essential and preferred requirements that can be used to shape the rest of the recruitment process.

When doing this, it is also important not to become overly focussed on technical skills at the expense of ‘soft skills’ that might make people successful in the company. For example, if you will require the successful applicant to cover absent staff and move between departments on occasion, finding somebody who is very adaptable with strong teamwork skills might be equally or more important than their ability to work with a particular piece of software.

Once the requirements of the role have been agreed, these should be communicated as accurately as possible in the job advertisement. You might think that a massive response from an advert constitutes a good response, but in fact if you are accurate in your description, you should get a smaller but more appropriate group of applicants.

Filter candidates by phone
Many small businesses will invite people to interview after a brief conversation on the phone, but using this opportunity to conduct a proper first interview can save time and money by filtering only the better candidates through to the next stage.

Structure the telephone call to ensure that you are consistent in your approach and address all the areas that you need to cover. Have a
make a list of essential and preferred requirements that can be used to shape the rest of the recruitment process
full set of questions prepared in the form of a script, just as you would for a face-to-face interview, and use the opportunity to assess their communications skills and uncover barriers to their employability such as their eligibility to work or travel arrangements.

The telephone interview is also a great opportunity to make sure the candidate’s expectations about what the role entails are aligned with you own requirements. The more information you can give to the candidate at this stage, the less chance there is of a problem arising when you meet in person.

Be realistic
In both the phone and face-to-face interviews, competency based questions that ask candidates to explain how they dealt with a particular scenario can be useful for assessing attitudes and behaviours, but sometimes, when there’s a huge pressure to fill a gap it can be easy to cut corners which can often lead to hiring the wrong person. A manager might find themselves ignoring their intuition and leading a candidate who is struggling to give the right answers, especially if they had positive expectations from their CV. This is unwise as a struggling candidate is unlikely to have the skills required for the role. The business will then have to shoulder the expense of firing the poor performer and going through the whole recruitment process again.

To avoid this, when you reach the face-to-face interview stage, it’s best to avoid interviewing alone so that there is always a second perspective on the candidate. In addition, sharing the interview with another person who takes notes allows the interviewer to concentrate on the candidate’s responses to questions.

Align expectations
If you find the right person, you will probably want them to stay with the company long-term. While it’s an accepted fact that careers are rarely for life these days, there are some steps you can take during recruitment to improve employee retention. The key is to ensure that the expectations of both parties, about how the role is likely to develop, are aligned. This doesn’t necessarily mean you need to have promotion in sight; often, candidates are simply looking for the prospect of extra responsibility to keep the role interesting and broaden their skill-base.

Whatever size office you are in, it is also advisable to show candidates their potential working environment as part of the recruitment process. A quick tour of the office should help them visualise themselves in the role and get a feel of what the future might look like with that particular company.

Often, small companies shy away from some of the tips given above, such as competency-based assessments because they seem the domain of the large organisation. However, if you are willing to put the time into planning it is possible run a very effective recruitment process at a low cost and finding the right candidate first time.
Link

Sony Computer Entertainment claims that retail sales of its new PlayStation 3 (PS3) computer entertainment system achieved a total of 1 million units worldwide in the 3 weeks since its launch on September 1, 2009.

The expansion of the PS3 platform is being accelerated along with the introduction of more software titles as well as the enhancement of PlayStation Network.

Recently, Microsoft had announced that sales of Xbox 360 consoles passed the 30 million mark globally, with its Xbox LIVE community swelling to more than 20 million active members. The gaming system has achieved 28% growth in 2009, said the company. (Read: Xbox 360 Console Sales Hit 30 Million)

While offering interactive entertainment content including Blu-ray Disc games and movies as well as content and services downloadable through PlayStation Network, the new PS3 is available for 29,980 yen (including tax), US$299, and euro 299, with a streamlined form factor and a pre-installed 120GB Hard Disk Drive.

The popularity of console-based games can be assessed from the fact that Halo 3, a video game developed for Microsoft Xbox 360 console, grossed $300 million worldwide in its first week of launch.

According to DFC Intelligence, a global digital games market tracker, combined cumulative worldwide sales for Microsoft Xbox 360, Sony PlayStation 3, and Nintendo Wii systems are expected to be 180-210 million units by 2012.
Link

A key panel of the International Monetary Fund said Sunday that it supports giving more voting power to emerging market and developing countries, warning that the legitimacy of the institution was at stake.

The group’s International Monetary and Financial Committee said it backs a shift of at least 5 percent of voting power from countries with ample representation to those with little influence. The move would seek to reflect changes in the global economy, with strong growth in countries that once lagged far behind the elite club of rich nations.

“Quota reform is crucial for increasing the legitimacy and effectiveness of the Fund,” the committee said in a statement. It planned to review progress at its next meeting in Washington on April 24, and sought an agreement on the voting shift by January 2011. The change would then be subject to approval by the legislatures of some member countries.

“This is a process that will take time. It won’t happen overnight,” said committee chairman Youssef Boutros-Ghali. “We are reforming an organization that is complex, sophisticated and reaching every corner of the world economy.”

The committee, which sets the IMF’s agenda, said it was also committed to protecting the voting share of its poorest members. Panel members include IMF Managing Director Dominique Strauss-Kahn and U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, and other finance chiefs.

The announcement came at the IMF’s annual meeting, held this year in Istanbul. It followed a decision at a Pittsburgh forum that the G-20 nations would become the world’s main economic decision-making forum, effectively taking over the role of the G-7 group of rich countries.

Earlier Sunday, Geithner said “a more representative, responsive and accountable governance structure is essential to strengthening the IMF’s legitimacy.”

He noted that G-20 countries had committed to shift some control in the IMF to countries with relatively little input. The Group of 20 includes developing economic powerhouses such as China, India and Brazil.

Geithner said the IMF should outline soon how the proposed transfer of voting power can occur. He said reform of the IMF’s executive board was vital to modernizing the Washington-based institution, which represents 186 countries. The U.S. recommends reducing the board size while preserving the current number of emerging market and developing country chairs.

The IMF is usually headed by a European and the World Bank by an American. It has received pledges of more money to help poor countries struggling to emerge from the global economic crisis, and a broader range of nations wants to have more say in how the funds are handled.

Aid agency OXFAM says current voting formulas at the IMF give Luxembourg more weight than the Philippines, which has almost 200 times the population. It said the 5 percent shift in voting power was insufficient.

“They need to give more voice to the poorest countries, have fewer European seats on the Board, and get rid of the U.S. veto,” said Caroline Pearce, OXFAM policy adviser. She said the IMF can only be relevant if it gives “countries hardest hit by the financial crisis a say in their own destiny.”

The U.S. has a 17 percent voting stake in the IMF, effectively giving it veto power because major decisions require an 85-percent majority to pass.

SOLIDAR, a European network of non-governmental organizations, said the calls for a 5 percent shift amounted to “grandstanding” that distracted attention from the harsh impact of IMF austerity policies in nations including Ethiopia and Latvia.

“Governments are still being forced to cut pensions, jobs in the public sector, unemployment benefits, teacher’s salaries, and the list goes on,” Andrea Maksimovic of SOLIDAR said in a statement.

The IMF has often been criticized for allegedly imposing tough measures on countries in exchange for loans and without sufficient regard for the impact on the poor.

IMF officials say they have shown more flexibility in recent years. John Lipsky, the IMF’s No 2. official, has said the IMF is undertaking “substantial efforts” toward internal reform that will provide “a fair shake for all our members.”

At the Istanbul conference, a group of 35 heavily indebted countries welcomed the G-20’s new role as a leader in global economic decisions, but said poor nations also needed representation to express their financing needs.

“We need at least one seat so that almost 1 billion Africans can express their views,” said Lazare Essimi Menye, Cameroon’s finance minister.

Link